xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike AT saxonica.com>
- To: "'Wolfgang Hoschek'" <whoschek AT lbl.gov>, "'Elliotte Harold'" <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: 'Wolfgang Hoschek' <whoschek AT yahoo.com>, xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: RE: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:06:25 -0000
> As I said, this misses the point. The point is that trying to tweak a
> little memory to enable very large documents is a loosing
> battle. It's a fight one cannot win, only loose.
I disagree with this. Firstly, if you can halve the memory requirements then
you've increased the number of people who can use your product by a useful
margin. More importantly, I've found that whenever you take reasonable steps
to be less profligate with memory, you increase speed. Allocating and
reclaiming memory takes time. OK: the number of objects is probably more
important than the number of bytes. But they tend to be correlated.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?
, (continued)
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Elliotte Harold, 02/01/2005
-
RE: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Michael Kay, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Elliotte Harold, 02/02/2005
- RE: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?, Michael Kay, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Elliotte Harold, 02/02/2005
-
RE: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Michael Kay, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 02/01/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Elliotte Harold, 02/01/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 02/01/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?, Wolfgang Hoschek, 02/02/2005
- RE: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?, Michael Kay, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 02/01/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?, Elliotte Harold, 02/01/2005
-
RE: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Michael Kay, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Elliotte Harold, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Nils_Kilden-Pedersen, 02/02/2005
- Message not available
- Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?, Wolfgang Hoschek, 02/02/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?, Elliotte Harold, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Nils_Kilden-Pedersen, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Elliotte Harold, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Elliotte Harold, 02/01/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] indexOf O(1) patch?,
Elliotte Harold, 02/01/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.