xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: John Cowan <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:03:39 -0500
Elliotte Harold scripsit:
> An XPath expression applied to a XOM Document should return the same
> information as the same expression applied to the serialized form of
> that Document.
The difficulty is that the value of an XPath expression of type nodeset
is a set of nodes (lower case referring to the XPath data model), whereas
your proposed API returns a set (or rather a sequence, but that's no
problem) of Nodes (title case referring to objects of class Node).
There is no way to reliably map a sequence of Nodes into a sequence of
nodes without examining the tree itself.
Specifically, every non-Text Node corresponds to a single node,
but N consecutive Text Nodes may refer to 1, 2, ... or N nodes.
If k consecutive Text Nodes n_j, n_j+1 ... n_j+k-1 in the result are
consecutive siblings in the tree, then they are part of the same node;
if not, not.
> In other words, take a XOM document, query it with an XPath expression,
> print out the resulting nodes with toXML.
>
> Take the same XOM document; serialize it; query the serialized form of
> an XML document with the same XPath expression using a tool like Alex
> Chafee's XPath Explorer.
>
> You should get the same results in both cases.
That depends on whether the tool produces the XML representations of
the nodesets with no intervening delimiters. If so, yes; if not, no.
In principle the answers are quite different.
--
Where the wombat has walked, John Cowan <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
it will inevitably walk again. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
-
RE: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath
, (continued)
- RE: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Michael Kay, 01/08/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Elliotte Harold, 01/08/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Wolfgang Hoschek, 01/08/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Elliotte Harold, 01/08/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Wolfgang Hoschek, 01/09/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Elliotte Harold, 01/10/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Wolfgang Hoschek, 01/10/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Elliotte Harold, 01/10/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Wolfgang Hoschek, 01/11/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Elliotte Harold, 01/11/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, John Cowan, 01/11/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Elliotte Harold, 01/12/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, John Cowan, 01/12/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Elliotte Harold, 01/12/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Bradley S. Huffman, 01/12/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, John Cowan, 01/12/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Bradley S. Huffman, 01/12/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Elliotte Harold, 01/08/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.1: XPath, Elliotte Harold, 01/07/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.