xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
[XOM-interest] Re: XSLTransform constructors are flawed
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- To: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek AT lbl.gov>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [XOM-interest] Re: XSLTransform constructors are flawed
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 06:06:07 -0400
At 1:02 PM -0700 9/2/04, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote:
Yes, but it seems that if XSLTransform(InputStream) is potentially problematic, so is Builder(InputStream) as well. The problem is the same, or am I missing something here?
Yes, but there are situations where you have an InputStream or a Reader and don't have a real base URI for it, so you just have to deal. These are probably more problematic more of the time with XSLT though, than with generic XML. I could pull the no-base methods out of Builder but those methods seem to me to be more likely to be used and less likely to cause problems than the ones in XSLTransform.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
-
[XOM-interest] Re: XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 09/02/2004
-
[XOM-interest] Re: XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/02/2004
-
[XOM-interest] Re: XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 09/02/2004
- [XOM-interest] Re: XSLTransform constructors are flawed, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/03/2004
-
[XOM-interest] XSLTransform(Templates templates),
Wolfgang Hoschek, 09/07/2004
- [XOM-interest] Re: XSLTransform(Templates templates), Wolfgang Hoschek, 09/07/2004
-
[XOM-interest] Re: XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 09/02/2004
-
[XOM-interest] Re: XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/02/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.