xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild
- From: John Cowan <cowan AT ccil.org>
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:38:23 -0500
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> Is it that you'd like an HTMLElement
> that could only be a child of an HTMLElement or an HTMLDocument, but
> could not be a child of a generic Document or Element?
Exactly.
> I guess I'm stuck on the fact that with the notable exception of
> Schematron, most validity rules flow from the parent top the child,
> not the other way around. When we write a DTD or a schema we list the
> allowed children, not the allowed parents.
I'd like there to be a way for any attempt to add a ParagraphElement
to an HTMLElement to introduce a BodyElement between them, but
the check methods can't accomplish that.
--
John Cowan jcowan AT reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com
www.ccil.org/~cowan
I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths
led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen. I am the clue-finder,
the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number. --Bilbo
-
[XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
jcowan, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
jcowan, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
John Cowan, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/10/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild, John Cowan, 03/10/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
John Cowan, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
jcowan, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] checkDetach vs. checkRemoveChild,
jcowan, 03/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.