xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- To: Bill de hÓra <bill AT dehora.net>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Re: XOM 1.0d23 Last Call
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:08:23 -0500
At 9:47 PM +0000 2/9/04, Bill de hÓra wrote:
I consider namespace scenarios convenience clutter for the most part. But then again, with this line of thought, most OO methods are convenience clutter including getChildCount (why not just compute the count?).
Because it would be hugely more expensive. getChildCount() is O(1). Iterating through the elements until you got the last one would be O(N) with a big juicy multiplier for catching the exception. getChildCount() is more convenient, faster, and more consistent with good OOP principles. (Specifically use exceptions ionly for exceptional cases.)
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
-
[XOM-interest] Re: XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 02/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Re: XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Bill de hÓra, 02/09/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Re: XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, jcowan, 02/09/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Re: XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/10/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Re: XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Bill de hÓra, 02/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.