xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- To: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [XOM-interest] Nodes vs. NodeList
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 12:14:03 -0400
I'm currently making a push to finish up the last few API issues in the XOM TODO list so I can move from a development release to an alpha release. The goal is that once I declare XOM alpha there won't be any breaking API changes without a very good reason.
One of the changes I'm considering making before that point is changing the name of the NodeList class to Nodes. This has several advantages:
1. Consistent with Elements and Attributes
2. No confusion or conflict with the DOM NodeList interface
3. Does not incorrectly imply that a NodeList is a java.util.List
Downside:
1. It's somewhat harder to distinguish in speech, especially for non-native speakers. It may not always be clear whether I'm talking about a Node or Nodes object.
Thoughts?
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
-
[XOM-interest] Nodes vs. NodeList,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 10/19/2003
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Nodes vs. NodeList,
Markus Jais, 10/19/2003
- Re: [XOM-interest] Nodes vs. NodeList, John Cowan, 10/19/2003
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Nodes vs. NodeList,
Markus Jais, 10/19/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.