xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike AT wyeast.net>
- To: "luca passani" <passani AT eunet.no>, "xom" <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [XOM-interest] XSLT and simplicity
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:03:27 -0800
I don't see XSLT as useless. I thinks it's simple and easy to learn, but
perhaps not as easy to learn as RELAX NG. %^} What would you suggest as a
simpler alternative to XSLT that would give you similar results?
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xom-interest-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:xom-interest-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org]On Behalf Of luca passani
> Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 6:17 PM
> To: xom
> Subject: [XOM-interest] XSLT and simplicity
>
>
>
> I see that XSLT is in the roadmap for XOM.Isn't this a contradiction
> of the design principle that XOM should be a simple XML API?
>
> My impression has always been that XSLT is not simple, it's mostly useless
> and it's impossible to debug and maintain. Of course, that could
> be only me.
>
> Just an idea
>
> luca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> XOM-interest mailing list
> XOM-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/xom-interest
>
-
[XOM-interest] XSLT and simplicity,
luca passani, 03/22/2003
- [XOM-interest] Day change for XOM BoF, Elliotte Harold - java FAQ, 03/24/2003
- RE: [XOM-interest] XSLT and simplicity, Mike Fitzgerald, 03/24/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.