Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-users - Re: [SM-Users] nptl glibc spell

sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Sourcemage Users List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Users] nptl glibc spell
  • Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:46:50 +1100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:35, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>:
> > What exactly is the benefit of using the nptl-enabled glibc? Do my apps
> > need a recompile? When I get back to campus I'll definitely check it
> > out.
> >
> > Jeremy
>
> There is some information on the Debian thread below:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200310/msg00611.html
>
> In short, they say that for most applications you will /not/ have to
> recompile (guess I just wasted a bunch of CPU ;)).
>
> -sandalle

SOrry I should have stressed it was a drop in replacement for me EXCEPT for
NVIDIA_driver which needed recompiling.
I am recompiling stuff because
a) I am a freak
b) I am a freak
c) I want to make 100% sure that the new glibc + nptl don't cause any
compilation problems for any other spells.
d) refer a) & b)

Sorry Eric I assumed you were rebuilding for the same reasons ( without the
Freak accusation though :) )
Hamish

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4TE98fSufZR6424RAhlpAJ4rpNtbzK3YFqYX2dLPsaXI6f3EJwCbBO9x
ZUmYI0XH+kvm0/SqsATsb3I=
=Jvhg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page