sm-spell-submit AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Submit list for new spells

List archive

Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]Re: utils/pam_ldap and libs/nss_ldap

From: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>
To: Jeffrey Schmidt <jschmidt AT fnal.gov>, "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
Cc: "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>, SMGL Spell Submit <sm-spell-submit AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]Re: utils/pam_ldap and libs/nss_ldap
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:59:17 +0200

Ok, will do it now...

Eric

> On Wednesday October 9 2002 19:47, Jeffrey Schmidt wrote:
> ok w/ me.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 05:35, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I believe the two spells in the subject belong together in `utils', so
> > may I suggest moving nss_ldap there? Also, nss_ldap has to upgraded to
> > 202 (now 201), and pam_ldap to 153 (now 150). pam_ldap doesn't compile
> > with current OpenLDAP, I'll have to research this, but I do know that
> > pam_ldap 150 on my systems (compiled against earlier OpenLDAP) works OK
> > on the protocol level.
> > I thought I'd bring it up before 10th.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Sergey.

[SM-Spell-Submit]utils/pam_ldap and libs/nss_ldap, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 10/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]utils/pam_ldap and libs/nss_ldap, Julian v. Bock, 10/09/2002
- [SM-Spell-Submit]Re: utils/pam_ldap and libs/nss_ldap, Jeffrey Schmidt, 10/09/2002
  - Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]Re: utils/pam_ldap and libs/nss_ldap, Eric Schabell, 10/09/2002