Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem)

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
  • To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem)
  • Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 08:51:33 -0800

On Friday 06 February 2004 10:39 am, Ricardo Izquierdo wrote:
> From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 03:38, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > > While I agree that delays are bad, especially such a momentus release
> > > as a 1.0, I'd rather have 1.0 done right and late than released on
> > > time, but have to release 1.0.1 or 1.1 a few weeks later (or months) to
> > > fix issues that we knew were in it. Sounds too much like MS products to
> > > me.
> > >
> > > -sandalle
> >
> > I agree
> > We have blood, sweat and tears invested in this, not dollars.
> >
> > Hamish
>
> I agree with you Hamish and with Sandalle. Also releasing ver 1.0.1 or 1.1
> a few weeks later, will discourage the new users to continue walking the
> "magical" path of the source code.
>
> Ricardo.

Since we have been releasing minor versions every month or two, and there has
been no word about what was happening after 1.0, and since I'm accustom to
every other software product out there having bugs and needing .1 or .0.1
releases, I have just been under the impression that an update to Source Mage
would be released eventually.

I am of the mind set that it's going to have bugs in it no matter how hard we
try to clean it up. We just need to try as hard as possible to not have any
Really Bad (tm) or Show Stopping (also tm) bugs. Just my jaded opinion.

--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page