sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- Cc: sm-sorcery <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 21:41:13 -0000
No, they can be replaced. It's a bad habit of mine.
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 17:33, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> I strongly believe backticks `cmd` must be dropped in favor of $(cmd).
> Any adverse effects here?
>
> Dufflebunk wrote:
>
> >Ok, did someone mess w/ the sorcery script? The syntax in that is very
> >tricky. It looks like it's looking for a program called $DIALOGPROG,
> >rather than a program call the value of $DIALOGPROG.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Eric Schabell, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Dufflebunk, 05/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test, Ladislav Hagara, 05/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test, Eric Sandall, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Eric Sandall, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Dufflebunk, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test, Dufflebunk, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Eric Sandall, 05/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test, Eric Sandall, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Dufflebunk, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Eric Sandall, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Dufflebunk, 05/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test, Eric Sandall, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test, Eric Sandall, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Dufflebunk, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Eric Sandall, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Dufflebunk, 05/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: sorcery-1.0.6 torture test,
Dufflebunk, 05/27/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.