sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Jason Flatt <jasonflatt AT wizard.com>
- To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery upgrade
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:46:35 +0000
On Friday 15 November 2002 01:31 pm, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> Hmm.
>
> Out of curiosity, why is there still a warning about sorcery scripts
> being lost when a "sorcery upgrade" is run?
>
> Clearly we changed the sorcery update system to avoid that problem. So
> should that big block of text even be there?
>
> One thing we /need/ to do before 1.0 is go through and make sure
> everything:
>
> a) Looks consistent w/ color usage, correct messages, etc
> b) Has correct "help" files - lots of things have changed, etc.
>
> I will have a go w/ scribe today, to add new features to the help and
> to clean up it's look. Hopefully people can work on the others.
>
> -Ryan
I also think it would be a good idea if the switches for the various sorcery
components were consistant with the rest of unixdom, ie: using a single dash
with single letters and double dashes with words (-u | --update).
--
Jason Flatt
Section maintainer for printer
E-mail (remove the spaces): jasonflatt @ wizard . com
E-mail (remove the spaces): jflatt @ sourcemage . org
IRC: Oadae
-
[SM-Sorcery]sorcery upgrade,
Ryan Abrams, 11/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery upgrade, Jason Flatt, 11/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.