sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com>
- To: nealbirch <nealbirch AT attbi.com>
- Cc: eric AT sandall.us, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?
- Date: 04 Nov 2002 22:25:58 -0700
Well i backed up the files, removed 'em and rebooted just fine. The
spell dispelled jsut fine too.
Bearcat
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 20:57, nealbirch wrote:
> Bearcat M. Sandor wrote:
> > Neal,
>
> > On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 13:36, nealbirch wrote:
> >
> >>Eric Sandall wrote:
> >>
> >>>Bearcat M. Sandor said:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Folks,
> >>>>
> >>>>When doing an integrity check my system complains that lmbr is not in
> >>>>the test grimoire..what is lmbr. Aparently I have 1.03 installed. doing
> >>>>a gaze depends on it returns nothing.
> >>>>
> >>>>Bearcat
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Could that be 'lvm'? It's at v1.0.5 atm.
> >>>
> >>>-One of Four
> >>>a.k.a. sandalle
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>Nah, i had the same error. lmbr was something that was installed by the
> >>original sorcery cd install, my guess. consensus is it's short for Linux
> >>Master Boot Record
> >
> > Can I safely dispell it? Or should I remove it from the install log.
> >
> > Bearcat
> >
>
> It doesn't hurt anything that I know of, it's kind of like an appendix.
> I don't think you CAN dispell it because it's not a spell anymore... and
> if you could... this is from the install log:
>
> /boot/lmbr
> /sbin/lmbr-install
> /usr/doc/lmbr
> /usr/doc/lmbr/README
> /var/log/sorcery/compile/lmbr-1.0.3.bz2
> /var/log/sorcery/install/lmbr-1.0.3
> /var/log/sorcery/md5sum/lmbr-1.0.3
>
> the README tells you all. maybe someone needs to rewrite the lmbr spell
> and put it back?
>
> Compile log for lmbr 1.0.3 Built on Fri Jan 11 06:59:29... jeez, have
> I been using this that long?!
>
>
>
> --
> "You can fool some of the people all of the time
> --and those are the ones you have to concentrate on!"
> GW Bush-- from the N.Y. Times
>
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]GCC faiils to cast or make
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]GCC faiils to cast or make,
Julian v. Bock, 11/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]GCC faiils to cast or make, Bearcat M. Sandor, 11/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]GCC faiils to cast or make, Bearcat M. Sandor, 11/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]GCC faiils to cast or make,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 11/03/2002
-
Message not available
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]GCC faiils to cast or make, Bearcat M. Sandor, 11/04/2002
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]GCC faiils to cast or make,
Julian v. Bock, 11/03/2002
-
[SM-Sorcery]LMBR?,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 11/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?,
Eric Sandall, 11/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?,
nealbirch, 11/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 11/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?, nealbirch, 11/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?, Bearcat M. Sandor, 11/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?, nealbirch, 11/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 11/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?,
nealbirch, 11/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]LMBR?,
Eric Sandall, 11/03/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.