sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]libdepends
- Date: 13 Oct 2002 19:47:50 -0400
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 19:41, Andrew wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:00:47PM -0400, Dufflebunk wrote:
> > Add "; then" to then end of line 197.
> thanks.
>
> >I don't think any of the sorcery
> > team said anything about not breaking the build.
> >
> well if one looks back at the last time this happened, not even a week
> ago, the list had messages to that effect, granted no one said they
> _would_ make sure not to submit broken code, but it certainly seems like
> a logical proposition to me. Im not saying the code should be perfectly
> bug free, but blatent obvious problems like this shouldnt make it into
> the nightly tarball.
You are right, problems like this shouldn't.
>
> heres a URL to the thread if you need a refresher:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-sorcery/2002-October/000456.html
I recall.
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Sorcery]libdepends,
Andrew, 10/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libdepends,
Dufflebunk, 10/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libdepends,
Andrew, 10/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libdepends,
Dufflebunk, 10/13/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]libdepends, Eric Sandall, 10/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libdepends,
Dufflebunk, 10/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libdepends,
Andrew, 10/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libdepends,
Dufflebunk, 10/13/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.