sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
[SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Eric Sandall <sandalle AT hellhound.homeip.net>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells
- Date: 05 Aug 2002 23:21:38 -0400
This thread is from SM-Discuss, but should be here.
Done. http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=spell_triggers has a bit
more info on what I did... adding new triggers or actions is easy to do.
I made the first four actions that came to mind: cast_self (really
recast_self), dispel_self, check_self, and run_script. The four triggers
that I put in are on_cast, on_pre_cast, on_dispel, and on_pre_dispel.
I'm pretty sure I didn't commit it properly to the CVS... so... yeah...
On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 18:29, Eric Sandall wrote:
>
> Sergey A. Lipnevich said:
> > It's not just a kernel spell problem. E.g. PHP module
> > will not work if Apache2 version changes, or openssh
> > has to be recompiled after openssl has been, or Galeon
> > and Mozilla (usually), there are probably other
> > "coupled" relationships. At the same time, simply
> > recompiling everything in the 'gaze depends x' list is
> > overkill, because most of such dependencies do not
> > depend on include files, instead they just link to the
> > libraries dynamically. That's what dynamic linking is
> > for, after all. I think we can add certain method,
> > 'affects' for example, to the DEPENDS file, listing
> > each spell that has to be recompiled after the one in
> > question.
> >
> > --Sergey.
>
> I like this idea. Anyone have the time/skill to send a patch for this to
> the sorcery team? Or should we discuss this more, first?
>
> -One of Three
>
> --
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> sandalle AT hellhound.homeip.net | http://www.sourcemage.org
> http://hellhound.homeip.net/~sandalle | SystAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @
> WSU
> ICQ: 667348 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Grimoire mailing list
> SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
>
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.ch.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x92B5D3F1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Dufflebunk, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Nicholas K. Jennings, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Dufflebunk, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Dufflebunk, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells, Jon Svendsen, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Dufflebunk, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Dufflebunk, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells, Nicholas K. Jennings, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells, Nicholas K. Jennings, 08/06/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells, Chris Brien, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Nicholas K. Jennings, 08/06/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.