sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13646] sub-dependencies are not integrated with resurrect
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13646] sub-dependencies are not integrated with resurrect
- Date: 6 Nov 2008 20:56:13 -0000
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
--- Comment #8 from Jaka Kranjc <jakakranjc AT email.si> 2008-11-06 14:56:12 ---
Ideally the user would be prompted to resurrect even an older cache/version if
that meant satisfying the requests. Some people would rather have an old
version of some dependency resurrected than be forced to compile a newer
version.
Even if you hack files in $DEPENDS_CONFIG manually (which we don't advertise),
the checks aren't needed. If a spell needs something else in another spell,
the
proper way to ensure that is via individual subdependencies, not by making
sorcery jump through hoops.
btw, you can get the sorcery docs by casting bashdoc.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13646] sub-dependencies are not integrated with resurrect,
bugzilla-daemon, 11/06/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13646] sub-dependencies are not integrated with resurrect, bugzilla-daemon, 11/06/2008
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13646] sub-dependencies are not integrated with resurrect, bugzilla-daemon, 11/06/2008
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13646] sub-dependencies are not integrated with resurrect, bugzilla-daemon, 11/06/2008
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13646] sub-dependencies are not integrated with resurrect, bugzilla-daemon, 11/06/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.