sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 9078] ARCH variable set in spells
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 9078] ARCH variable set in spells
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9078
acedit AT armory.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-24 20:57
-------
I'm going to use SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS so there's no chance of conflicting names,
and have it go from most specific to least specific architecture. This will
cause $SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS to be most specific arch (and == $ARCHITECTURE).
if someone prefers some other variable name, let me know.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-24 20:57
-------
I'm going to use SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS so there's no chance of conflicting names,
and have it go from most specific to least specific architecture. This will
cause $SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS to be most specific arch (and == $ARCHITECTURE).
if someone prefers some other variable name, let me know.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-24 20:57
-------
I'm going to use SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS so there's no chance of conflicting names,
and have it go from most specific to least specific architecture. This will
cause $SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS to be most specific arch (and == $ARCHITECTURE).
if someone prefers some other variable name, let me know.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-24 20:57
-------
I'm going to use SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS so there's no chance of conflicting names,
and have it go from most specific to least specific architecture. This will
cause $SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS to be most specific arch (and == $ARCHITECTURE).
if someone prefers some other variable name, let me know.
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-24 21:26 -------
Sounds fine by me we just need some way for binary spells to figure out what
arch
the system is and relate that to the binary packages that the spell should
offer
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-24 21:26 -------
Sounds fine by me we just need some way for binary spells to figure out what
arch
the system is and relate that to the binary packages that the spell should
offer
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-24 21:26 -------
Sounds fine by me we just need some way for binary spells to figure out what
arch
the system is and relate that to the binary packages that the spell should
offer
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-24 21:26 -------
Sounds fine by me we just need some way for binary spells to figure out what
arch
the system is and relate that to the binary packages that the spell should
offer
--
------- Additional Comments From acedit AT armory.com 2005-07-24 22:30 -------
I think least specific to most specific would be better since often spells
would
want just the generic architecture. They would have to loop through each value
in SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH[x] to find it. Also it seems easier to implement.
You could always make ARCHITECTURE also be an array from most specific to
least
specific.
--
------- Additional Comments From acedit AT armory.com 2005-07-24 22:30 -------
I think least specific to most specific would be better since often spells
would
want just the generic architecture. They would have to loop through each value
in SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH[x] to find it. Also it seems easier to implement.
You could always make ARCHITECTURE also be an array from most specific to
least
specific.
--
------- Additional Comments From acedit AT armory.com 2005-07-24 22:30 -------
I think least specific to most specific would be better since often spells
would
want just the generic architecture. They would have to loop through each value
in SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH[x] to find it. Also it seems easier to implement.
You could always make ARCHITECTURE also be an array from most specific to
least
specific.
--
------- Additional Comments From acedit AT armory.com 2005-07-24 22:30 -------
I think least specific to most specific would be better since often spells
would
want just the generic architecture. They would have to loop through each value
in SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH[x] to find it. Also it seems easier to implement.
You could always make ARCHITECTURE also be an array from most specific to
least
specific.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-25 01:47
-------
Created an attachment (id=4436)
--> (http://bugs.sourcemage.org/attachment.cgi?id=4436&action=view)
--> (http://bugs.sourcemage.org/attachment.cgi?id=4436&action=view)
Potential Enhancement
This patch crates a set_architecture function that does what is requested and
includes later suggestions too. SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS goes from most generic to
most specific, ARCHITECTURE goes the opposite way.
NOTE: It sets ARCHITECTURE even if the arch it uses comes from TARGET (ie when
cross install is enabled). I'm not sure if that's desireable or not.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-25 01:47
-------
Created an attachment (id=4436)
--> (http://bugs.sourcemage.org/attachment.cgi?id=4436&action=view)
--> (http://bugs.sourcemage.org/attachment.cgi?id=4436&action=view)
Potential Enhancement
This patch crates a set_architecture function that does what is requested and
includes later suggestions too. SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS goes from most generic to
most specific, ARCHITECTURE goes the opposite way.
NOTE: It sets ARCHITECTURE even if the arch it uses comes from TARGET (ie when
cross install is enabled). I'm not sure if that's desireable or not.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-25 01:47
-------
Created an attachment (id=4436)
--> (http://bugs.sourcemage.org/attachment.cgi?id=4436&action=view)
--> (http://bugs.sourcemage.org/attachment.cgi?id=4436&action=view)
Potential Enhancement
This patch crates a set_architecture function that does what is requested and
includes later suggestions too. SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS goes from most generic to
most specific, ARCHITECTURE goes the opposite way.
NOTE: It sets ARCHITECTURE even if the arch it uses comes from TARGET (ie when
cross install is enabled). I'm not sure if that's desireable or not.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-25 01:47
-------
Created an attachment (id=4436)
--> (http://bugs.sourcemage.org/attachment.cgi?id=4436&action=view)
--> (http://bugs.sourcemage.org/attachment.cgi?id=4436&action=view)
Potential Enhancement
This patch crates a set_architecture function that does what is requested and
includes later suggestions too. SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS goes from most generic to
most specific, ARCHITECTURE goes the opposite way.
NOTE: It sets ARCHITECTURE even if the arch it uses comes from TARGET (ie when
cross install is enabled). I'm not sure if that's desireable or not.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-25 02:16
-------
FYI that patch doesn't actualy work.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-25 02:16
-------
FYI that patch doesn't actualy work.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-25 02:16
-------
FYI that patch doesn't actualy work.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-25 02:16
-------
FYI that patch doesn't actualy work.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-30 18:31
-------
Working patch submited to devel.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-30 18:31
-------
Working patch submited to devel.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-30 18:31
-------
Working patch submited to devel.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-30 18:31
-------
Working patch submited to devel.
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-30 21:06 -------
Okay so can we use both the ARCHITECTURE and the SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH arrays?
ARCHITECTURE is specific to generic and SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH is generic to
specific.
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-30 21:06 -------
Okay so can we use both the ARCHITECTURE and the SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH arrays?
ARCHITECTURE is specific to generic and SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH is generic to
specific.
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-30 21:06 -------
Okay so can we use both the ARCHITECTURE and the SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH arrays?
ARCHITECTURE is specific to generic and SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH is generic to
specific.
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-30 21:06 -------
Okay so can we use both the ARCHITECTURE and the SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH arrays?
ARCHITECTURE is specific to generic and SMGL_COMPAT_ARCH is generic to
specific.
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-30 21:06 -------
Oh and when can this be moved to test/stable sorcery?
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-30 21:06 -------
Oh and when can this be moved to test/stable sorcery?
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-30 21:06 -------
Oh and when can this be moved to test/stable sorcery?
--
------- Additional Comments From dmlb2000 AT gmail.com 2005-07-30 21:06 -------
Oh and when can this be moved to test/stable sorcery?
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-30 21:32
-------
Yes.
I do not know the schedule for stable or test integration.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-30 21:32
-------
Yes.
I do not know the schedule for stable or test integration.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-30 21:32
-------
Yes.
I do not know the schedule for stable or test integration.
--
------- Additional Comments From pmahon AT sourcemage.org 2005-07-30 21:32
-------
Yes.
I do not know the schedule for stable or test integration.
--
------- Additional Comments From acedit AT armory.com 2005-10-21 13:06 -------
re-marking as fixed
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 9078] ARCH variable set in spells, bugzilla-daemon, 10/21/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.