Bugs for Sorcery are reported here

[bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org]

http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8463





------- Additional Comments From acedit AT armory.com  2005-09-24 10:16 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'd do CONFIGURE_CMD and MAKE_CMD instead of a BUILD_CMD.
> Why? To reduce doubling of the code.

You could do this on your end:
BUILD_CMD="autotools_configure && jam_build"

Also, CONFIGURE_CMD would confuse itself with overriding the CONFIGURE file 
that
runs before DEPENDS.

> 
> jam based systems still use ./configure with the same options
> so basicaly having an autotools_configure, scons_configure,
> jam_build, make_build, scons_build Would be nice.
> 
> Like the DETAILS idea... I think I was discussing that one on irc
> with somebody though and someone mentioned that we don't want more
> vars in DETAILS.
> 
> I accually like it to be settable in DETAILS. One less file to have
> in the spell.

Exactly. You're going to have to have the info _somewhere_, so either theres a
file with a single line in it, or a line in DETAILS doing the same thing at 
much
less cost. If someone doesnt want more lines in their spell's DETAILS file 
they
can add a file. Its up to them how they want to do it since the same functions
available to the *_CMD vars are accessible in the spell files.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.