sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8325] Optional database for indexing
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8325] Optional database for indexing
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:46:30 -0800 (PST)
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8325
------- Additional Comments From acedit AT armory.com 2005-02-26 14:46 -------
the flat files arent what makes sorcery slow, in fact, they're what make it
fast, the part that makes it slow is extracting the data from spells, if you
look at any given slow part of sorcery, loading spells is almost always the
bottleneck.
Until we increase the number of spells we have by several orders of magnitude,
the overhead with using a DB is almost certainly going to be greater than
using
grep/awk/libhash on a flat file. This isnt necessarily a bad idea, I just
think
its a misguided attempt at optimizing in the wrong place.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8325] Optional database for indexing,
bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8325] Optional database for indexing, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2005
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8325] Optional database for indexing, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.