sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8047] gpg checking for spells
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8047] gpg checking for spells
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:43:54 -0800 (PST)
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8047
------- Additional Comments From hgr AT vabo.cz 2005-01-20 17:43 -------
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2004-December/008827.html
"the md5s alone are "relatively" secure as they are already under the blanket
of
the grimoire gpg signature"
---
Signing by vendors is great, we quite long have used it in linux spell.
Signing
all grimoires and sorcery is great. I only do not agree that signing by Source
Mage developers "greatly enhanced level of security over md5" (your last
sentence).
Do not we believe in Perforce? Do not we believe in HISTORY files?
And how will we check "gnupg"? Will it be placed in basesystem and install
iso?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8047] gpg checking for spells,
bugzilla-daemon, 01/20/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8047] gpg checking for spells, bugzilla-daemon, 01/20/2005
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8047] gpg checking for spells, bugzilla-daemon, 01/20/2005
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 8047] gpg checking for spells, bugzilla-daemon, 01/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.