Bugs for Sorcery are reported here

[bugzilla-daemon AT metalab.unc.edu]

http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6981

acedit AT armory.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sm-sorcery-
                   |                            |bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
         AssignedTo|sm-sorcery-                 |debauxit AT yahoo.it
                   |bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org      |



------- Additional Comments From acedit AT armory.com  2004-12-03 16:18 -------
Magically makes me nervous because i dont want to have to learn how this all
magically works when it breaks :-/

What if the password ends in a / or some other field ends in a / theres still
too much fuzziness in this for me to be comfortable having to maintain it.
Perhaps using some other unique seperation character or making all the 
optional
fields manditory fields and instead saying that if they are empty, they dont 
exist?

I think it would be best to do away with the patch-level field althogether 
since
one could just as easily include it as part of the revision (and thats all the
code does with it anyway). Arch has to parse it anyway so why not let it do 
the
hard work rather than us having to do it also. Besides sorcery doesnt really
care what the patch level is.

There appears to be a bug as well: you dont handle the case of unpacking to a
pre-existing tarball without a patch level. If you remove the patch level
requirement and fold it into the revision then the problem goes away.

Re-assigning, please hand back to me when you're done.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.