sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here

List archive

[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7294] spell_installed problem

From: bugzilla-daemon AT metalab.unc.edu
To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7294] spell_installed problem
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:50:30 -0400

http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7294

v.merkatz AT gmx.net changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement

------- Additional Comments From v.merkatz AT gmx.net 2004-08-30 14:50 -------
Ok, if sorcery needs that distinction internally I agree it's bad to change
the
semantics of the libapi function.
I filed bug #7295 about spell_held missing from libapi.
So I'll make this bug a feature request for a function returning true if the
spell is either held or installed since that's what is needed in spells and
people usually assume spell_installed does that.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7294] spell_installed problem, bugzilla-daemon, 08/30/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7294] spell_installed problem, bugzilla-daemon, 08/30/2004