sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here

List archive

[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 3688] Failed dependencies don't get listed . . .

From: bugzilla-daemon AT metalab.unc.edu
To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 3688] Failed dependencies don't get listed . . .
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:23:09 -0500

http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3688

jason AT flattfamily.com changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED

------- Additional Comments From jason AT flattfamily.com 2004-01-30 10:23
-------
Kudos! I now get the output I expect using the test I outlined in
"Additional
Comment #2 From Jason Flatt 2003-10-03 09:14".

Thanks.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 3688] Failed dependencies don't get listed . . ., bugzilla-daemon, 01/29/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 3688] Failed dependencies don't get listed . . ., bugzilla-daemon, 01/30/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 3688] Failed dependencies don't get listed . . ., bugzilla-daemon, 01/30/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 3688] Failed dependencies don't get listed . . ., bugzilla-daemon, 01/30/2004