sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT metalab.unc.edu
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 4354] gaze dependencies
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:43:13 -0500
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4354
------- Additional Comments From dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net 2003-12-11
23:43 -------
In dependancy resolution, if there is a cycle, the spells will all be cast,
but
they will be "de-cycled". The behaviour has always been _undefined_ on cyclic
dependancies... it could explode and refuse to cast anything. The fact that
sorcery doesn't rm -rf / is just from convention ;) Although it was a case
that was considered and a behaviour added so that it would do something
reasonable, like break the cycle.
In the cast of A depends on B, B optionaly depends on C you would suggest
cast A B (B w/o A)
the
cast A (with B support)
?
This cannot be done without rewriting libdepends again. The dependancies are
no
longer static for the whole cast, which increases the complexity considerably.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 4354] gaze dependencies,
bugzilla-daemon, 12/03/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 4354] gaze dependencies, bugzilla-daemon, 12/11/2003
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 4354] gaze dependencies, bugzilla-daemon, 12/11/2003
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 4354] gaze dependencies, bugzilla-daemon, 12/11/2003
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 4354] gaze dependencies, bugzilla-daemon, 12/12/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.