sm-security AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Security bugs are reported here via bugzilla

List archive

Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing Was: (no subject)

From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
To: sm-security AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing Was: (no subject)
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:11:45 -0700 (PDT)

Seth Woolley said:
> http://www.cryptnet.net/fdp/crypto/strong_distro.html

Interesting idea. Theoretically this wouldn't take much work, just
replace all of the md5 checks with gpg checks and setup an SMGL
signature-only key and have the developers sign it, as well as having
theirs signed by it.

The linux spell already implements this somewhat.

Now, I just need to find a webmail that allows GPG encryption and works. :(

-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle

--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61

Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

[SM-Security] (no subject), Seth Woolley, 05/14/2003
- Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing Was: (no subject), Eric Sandall, 05/14/2003
  - Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing, Seth Woolley, 05/14/2003
    - Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/14/2003
      - Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing, Seth Woolley, 05/15/2003
    - Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/14/2003
      - Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing, Seth Woolley, 05/15/2003
        
        Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 05/15/2003
        
        Re: [SM-Security] openPGP security by signing, Seth Woolley, 05/15/2003