sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:33:13 +0100
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:24:00AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>:
> > Ok, didn't know such a script existed :)
> > With that it's possible to use BUILD as new name, we just have to do it
> > for the whole grimoire before integrating everything, which will halt
> > spell updates and bugfixes for a bit. I think if we all work together we
> > can do it in one or two days, i definitely don't want a rush to just
> > convert and submit the whole grimoire, this should be carefully checked
> > (even if the script is bulletproof, i like to stay on the safe side).
> > So imho the best option for the conversion of spell format would be a
> > script that takes a section or a list of spells, p4 opens all it needs
> > and does the changes, but doesn't submit. So people could just say on
> > the channel that they're taking a section (so there's no overlap), run
> > the script on that section, then check it with p4 diff and submit if
> > it's alright.
> > I realize this seems more complicated than just a script that does
> > everything, but i really don't want _any_ spell to get broken by this,
> > we have enough work fixing bugs without generating new ones ourself :)
>
> I think this is a good plan of action. ;) Are we going to wait until after
> GNOME
> 2.6, or start now and just integrate it all when it's ready?
I would prefer waiting for gnome 2.6, but i'm open for suggestions of
doing it while gnome is very different in devel and test.
If i understand the overall course of action for this right, we want to
get these changes into test very soon, with a sorcery relying on a
API_VERSION file in the grimoire (we need that both in stable and devel
sorcery, unless we get all the sorcery changes into a stable release at
the same time we do the grimoire changes), so all of us and our
adventurous users can test it thoroughly before going into stable.
The problem i see is that we would have to either pull the beta gnome
2.6 into test or modify the gnome spells in test directly, which would
lead to a messy integration later.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Sourcemage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD, Robert Helgesson, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Mads Laursen, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD, Eric Sandall, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD, Andrew, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD, Robin Cook, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Eric Sandall, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Eric Sandall, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] splitting BUILD,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.