Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] Strange init problem

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Cory Schmidt <sourcemage AT schmidtsite.us>
  • To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Cc: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Strange init problem
  • Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:18:07 -0700

Well, the verdict is in and reiserfsprogs 3.6.12 is guilty. I downgraded
to .11 and mountall.sh ran just fine then I upgraded to .13 and it also ran
fine.

Thanks for the help in tracking it down.

Cory

On Monday 23 February 2004 09:52 am, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Cory Schmidt <sourcemage AT schmidtsite.us>:
> > My machine is an athlon-xp also, although I can't see how that would
> > have anything to do with it. I'm running a 2.4.2x kernel (I can't
> > remember if it's 23 or 24).
> >
> > The man page for reiserfsck states that with the --check option you CAN
> > check a read-only mounted reiserfs partition. From dufflebunk's previous
> > email, mount was reporting that / was mounted rw but when he tried to
> > create a file it failed saying / was mounted ro. So it sounds like
> > there's some strange voodoo going on with mount. Does someone with more
> > knowledge than me (almost everyone :-)) know how anything like that
> > could happen with mount?
>
> Yeah, I noticed that "/" was mounted as ro already, but fsck.reiserfs
> thought it wasn't. "/" was only mounted once here (no double-mounts) so I'm
> not sure where the fsck got the idea. Perhaps the newer version (it's been
> updated again since this bug appeared, have you updated to .13?) has
> problems reading the mount flags? Has anyone tried downgrading to .11 (I
> have not yet) to see if that fixes it?
>
> -sandalle




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page