sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: ""Jimmy Yen(顏孝杰)"" <jimmy AT yen.tp>
- To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 19:16:32 +0800
Hamish Greig wrote:
I am appalled by the lack of response to this thread.I'm inclined to think that anon cvs/p4 access would be sufficient. Not every microscopic change interests me, but I'm pretty biased...;)
So far i am the only response, does no-one else care? Does no-one else even have an opinion ?
Does no-one else agree but thinks they shouldn't comment because the Grimoire Lead suggested it ?
These sorts of things generally get resolved quicker if you actually voice your approval or disapproval.
If you are indifferent then it would still be nice to know that, because it would mean no-one "needs" the extra mail list.
Hamish
BTW, if the license even allows that is still an unanswered question.
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list,
Jason Flatt, 09/13/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list,
Hamish Greig, 09/13/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list, Andrew, 09/13/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list, Hamish Greig, 09/13/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list, Andrew, 09/13/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list, Hamish Greig, 09/13/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list, Eric Sandall, 09/13/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list, Andrew, 09/14/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list, Hamish Greig, 09/14/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list, Andrew, 09/14/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list,
Hamish Greig, 09/13/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Perforce list,
Jason Flatt, 09/13/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.