sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: "David Braaten" <xiticix47 AT hotmail.com>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire] Re: Comments in DETAILS
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:03:46 +0000
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 02:35:40 -0700 (PDT)...
From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
Dufflebunk said:
> Another question about the standard DETAILS format, are comments allowed
> in it?
> For example in duhdraw:
> VERSION=2.7.7 #1
>
> There are many more cases, but the ones I am interested in are the ones
> which are not alone on a line.
> That's not a perfect output, some in there are fine. It's not even a big
> problem, I can work around them. I just wanted to know if people find
> comments in DETAILS useful or not.
Comments are useful enough to keep them. :)
Comments CAN be useful, but that particular comment in duhdraw is meaningless to me, and perhaps most people...
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
-
[SM-Grimoire] Re: Comments in DETAILS,
David Braaten, 07/13/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: Comments in DETAILS, Eric Sandall, 07/13/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.