sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Comments in DETAILS
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 02:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Dufflebunk said:
> Another question about the standard DETAILS format, are comments allowed
> in it?
> For example in duhdraw:
> VERSION=2.7.7 #1
>
> There are many more cases, but the ones I am interested in are the ones
> which are not alone on a line.
>
> I wrote another quick one liner in case you want to see which I'm
> talking about:
> for i in /var/lib/sorcery/codex/devel/*/*/DETAILS ; do A=$(grep -E
> '[^[:blank:]][[:blank:]][[:blank:]]*#' $i | grep '=' ) ; [[ $A ]] &&
> echo "BAD? $i" && echo -e "\t$A"; done
>
> That's not a perfect output, some in there are fine. It's not even a big
> problem, I can work around them. I just wanted to know if people find
> comments in DETAILS useful or not.
Comments are useful enough to keep them. :)
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Grimoire] Comments in DETAILS,
Dufflebunk, 07/13/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Comments in DETAILS, Eric Sandall, 07/13/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.