sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- To: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
- Cc: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org, ace811 AT hotmail.com, Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:05:35 -0000
Installed here ok but it is god awful slow. And I am on a dual athlon
2000 system, guess I will try the swift-flash.
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 17:04, Geoffrey Derber wrote:
> Bearcat M. Sandor wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Eric,
> >
> > The DETAILS file contains
> >
> > 'SOURCE_DIRECTORY=$BUILD_DIRECTORY/install_flash_player_6_linux
> >
> > but BUILD_directory is not set anywhere in the files of the spell (is
> > this
> > defaulted to something?). If that is the case then the cp commands in
> > the
> > konquerer section of the PRE-BUILD file will have no effect since there
> > is
> > no directory set to copy them from.
> >
> > Right? That's what i think is happening. I tried deleting the
> > downloaded
> > tarball from /var/spool/sorcery and got the same result when it fetched a
> > new
> > one.
> >
> > Bearcat
>
> BUILD_DIRECTORY should be defined by sorcery somewhere as '/usr/src' so
> SOURCE_DIRECTORY=/usr/src/install_flash_player_6_linux
>
> BUILD_DIRECTORY is pretty standard usage throughout all spells, though
> why we made the variable name longer than the actual location, I don't know.
>
> Konquerer may have some issues as well still though, depends on if
> ewomack applied my patch that I sent him a week ago. If he hasn't
> applied it yet, then you'll have to install for either mozilla or
> netscape, and konquerer will read those installs to. It reads from a
> list of directories looking for plugins, my patch added
> '/usr/lib/konqueror' but the defaults include
> '/usr/lib/netscape/plugins/' and '/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins'. I don't
> think the patch has been applied yet.
>
> I'm pretty surprised that version of the spell is in test already, I
> think I only updated it a week ago (if that, may have been only Monday
> or Tuesday), and it did work for me.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Grimoire mailing list
> SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
>
-
[SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Eric Sandall, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 06/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79, Dufflebunk, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Eric Sandall, 06/27/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] Re: bug in flash-6.0r79 spell,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 06/28/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: bug in flash-6.0r79 spell, Eric Womack, 06/28/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] Re: bug in flash-6.0r79 spell,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 06/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Geoffrey Derber, 06/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79, Robin Cook, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Eric Sandall, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] flash-6.0r79,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/27/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.