sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire] USEGCC2...Really?
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:03:06 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
By my count, actually my (computer's count) we still have 57 spells that
have
the USEGCC2 flag, including gcc2 itself.
Now, I'm on the test grimoire, so it may be different in devel, but is it
nessesary? that all those spells use gcc2? I was hoping to get rid of it.
Bearcat M. Sandor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+w+Ruya+RPo9ly58RAvBqAJ4nnTyuJ8k55bVmVYlXNwlI6LbufACdGNZ/
1ItcGagikPw/0+U5TcNp7K4=
=StTd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Grimoire] gcc-3.3,
Julian v. Bock, 05/13/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] USEGCC2...Really?,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 05/15/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] USEGCC2...Really?, Geoffrey Derber, 05/15/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] USEGCC2...Really?, Eric Sandall, 05/15/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] USEGCC2...Really?,
Julian v. Bock, 05/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] USEGCC2...Really?, Julian v. Bock, 05/16/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] USEGCC2...Really?,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 05/15/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.