sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Adam Clark <adamsgl AT dhbit.ca>
- To: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
- Cc: eric AT sandall.us, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell that need upate
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:17:27 -0800
Julian,
Take the 2 seconds to write Eric about the test grimoire. It's really not
that difficult keeping it maintained.
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:52:20 +0100
julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock) wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "AC" == Adam Clark <adamsgl AT dhbit.ca> writes:
>
> AC> Those would be from the test grimoire. Apparently some gurus
> AC> don't notice the differences in the grimoires in the bug reports.
> AC> See bug 2425 as an example.
>
> Probably because the section maintainers don't maintain test and
> stable. Those bugs should not be autoassigned to them. (Anyone care to
> mess with bugzilla?)
>
> Julian
--
Adam Clark, Chat Section Maintainer, ISO Forger
Grimoire Gurus Cardholding Member
a.k.a. Kinetix on #sourcemage, #grimoire-gurus
Come see http://dhbit.ca for all your tech humour needs!
Attachment:
pgpptO8XxAu4T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Grimoire] spell that need upate,
Stephane Delanoue, 01/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell that need upate,
Eric Sandall, 01/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell that need upate,
Adam Clark, 01/31/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell that need upate,
Julian v. Bock, 01/31/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell that need upate, Adam Clark, 01/31/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell that need upate,
Julian v. Bock, 01/31/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell that need upate,
Adam Clark, 01/31/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell that need upate,
Eric Sandall, 01/30/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.