sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Mads Laursen <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]Why jed depends on Xft2 ???
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:14:54 +0100
On 23/11/02 16.06, M.L. wrote:
> On Samedi 23 Novembre 2002 14:10, Mads Laursen wrote:
> > On 23/11/02 11.25, M.L. wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > do really jed depends on Xft2 ?
> > >
> > > more /var/lib/sorcery/codex/test/editors/jed/DEPENDS
> > > depends slang &&
> > >
> > > optional_depends "Xft2" \
> > > "" \
> > > "" \
> > > "for anti-aliased font support"
> >
> > Last time I ran cast --fix xjed was linked against Xft2 (which I had
> > dispeled while fooling around with qt).
> >
>
> Well, ok... jed is text mode and has nothing to do with Xft... I enter a
> bug.
>
Well, yes and no. As far as I remember (I'm not at home to check right
now) jed installs two binaries, xjed and jed. jed is textmode and
should do fine without Xft2, but xjed is for X, and may link to Xft2
(which it does if it is installed).
So removing the dependancy would be wrong (especially since it works
without configure options, in other words if Xft2 is installed jed WILL
depend on it).
The correct solution would IMHO be to find the options to turn Xft2
support on AND off explicitly, and add those. Perhaps also an option
to build only jed?
/dossen
-
[SM-Grimoire]Why jed depends on Xft2 ???,
M.L., 11/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Why jed depends on Xft2 ???,
Mads Laursen, 11/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Why jed depends on Xft2 ???,
M.L., 11/23/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Why jed depends on Xft2 ???, M.L., 11/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Why jed depends on Xft2 ???,
Mads Laursen, 11/23/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Why jed depends on Xft2 ???, Arwed von Merkatz, 11/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Why jed depends on Xft2 ???,
M.L., 11/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Why jed depends on Xft2 ???,
Mads Laursen, 11/23/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.