sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Discuss] unmaintained sections
- From: Sergey A Lipnevich <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- To: "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>, Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: Source Mage Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Discuss] unmaintained sections
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:24:06 -0500
I noticed it too. As of right now, I synced our CVS to the current devel grimoire's `utils', and updated/added all checksums. I didn't check for broken links, because I don't have time right now to correct them. Also, many spells list SF.net explicitly instead of using SOURCEFORGE_URL.
Sergey.
Julian v. Bock wrote:
Hi
Our unmaintained sections become a serious problem, especially
'utils'. Many spells are outdated and don't have md5 or license
information. Does anyone have time to work on this?
Maybe one of the new users wants to become a grimoire guru?
Julian
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
------------------
Get free mailbox 20 Mb at http://www.hotbox.ru
-
[SM-Grimoire]unmaintained sections,
Julian v. Bock, 11/11/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Discuss] unmaintained sections,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 11/11/2002
- [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Discuss] unmaintained sections, Julian v. Bock, 11/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]unmaintained sections, M.L., 11/11/2002
- [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Discuss] unmaintained sections, Robin, 11/13/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Discuss] unmaintained sections,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 11/11/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.