sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:04:06 -0700
o, just to cap this thread. I think in Sunday's meeting we decided that
Xfree will be listed as a dependency for all X spells.
What about gcc and glibc?
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 08:07:12PM +0200, Julian v. Bock wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "D" == Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net> writes:
>
> D> xfree86 is a special case in spells. It's not listed as a
> D> dependency, since 1/2 the spells would then have it listed. Dito
> D> for gcc, all spells depends on gcc being there.
>
> Furthermore no base spells are listed (bash, grep, make, etc.)
>
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
-
[SM-Grimoire][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Dufflebunk, 10/18/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Nick Jennings, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Dufflebunk, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Julian v. Bock, 10/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Seth Woolley, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Andrew, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Andrew, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Andrew, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Robin, 10/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Andrew, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Seth Woolley, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Arwed von Merkatz, 10/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Julian v. Bock, 10/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Dufflebunk, 10/19/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Nick Jennings, 10/19/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.