sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Jonathan Evraire <evraire AT tuwg.com>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC)
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Okay, here's where a good use of our poll system on either
> http://news.sourcemage.org/ or http://www.grimoire-gurus.org/ . :) I say
> we have a poll on whether to leave the gcc2-dependant spells in the
> sections they already are, or to move them to the proposed z-gcc2 section,
> which I volunteer to create and maintain (with help, hopefully ;)) in CVS
> or P4, whichever the majority wants there as well.
I couldn't make a sensible vote without having all the info, such as "how
many spells are still using gcc2?" and "what percentage of the grimoire
does that represent?", and "what are the chances of dependencies breaking
(or other breakage) if we moved the spells?", etc.
Jonathan Evraire
evraire at tuwg.com
-
[SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Julian v. Bock, 10/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Andrew, 10/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Ryan Abrams, 10/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Andrew, 10/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Eric Sandall, 10/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells, Eric Schabell, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Jonathan Evraire, 10/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells, Eric Schabell, 10/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Eric Sandall, 10/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Andrew, 10/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Ryan Abrams, 10/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]gcc2 spells,
Andrew, 10/14/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.