sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells
- Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 16:11:04 -0500 (CDT)
Ahh, I see now.
Most or all of the non-kernel flavor spells in the kernels section should
probably be added to the end of the POST_INSTALL for the various kernel
spells: 3c990, e100, hcflinmodem, i2c, lm_sensors and ltmodem. cvsfs is
already there, and the NVIDIA_nforce spell I submitted to bugzilla will
also need to be added if accepted.
There has to be a better way to do this! Shouldn't we rebuild all
dependent spells?
-casey
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> It's the explicit 'cast' in POST_* something, look e.g.
> at openssl spell which rebuilds openssh.
>
> Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>:
>
> >
> >
> > How does sorcery determine if a dependent spell needs
> to be rebuilt
> > upon updating its dependency? This morning I noticed
> openssl was updated,
> > this caused openssh to rebuild. However, doing a
> 'gaze depends openssl'
> > shows more than openssh being dependent on openssl?
> Why does openssh
> > rebuild but not the others?
> >
> > Another example, every time I rebuild my kernel, the
> NVIDIA_kernel spell
> > gets rebuilt. How is this specified (I need to do it
> for the NVIDIA_nforce
> > spell).
> >
> >
> > -casey
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Grimoire mailing list
> > SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Sergey Lipnevich, MCSE, SCPJ,
> Sr. Software Engineer,
> New Age Network New York, Inc.,
> +1-848-459-LIPN.
>
-
[SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Casey Harkins, 08/05/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Casey Harkins, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells, Dufflebunk, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells, Eric Sandall, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Casey Harkins, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells, Chris Brien, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Auto rebuilding dependent spells, Eric Sandall, 08/05/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.