SourceMage Grimoire Bug List

[bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org]

http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14127





------- Additional Comments From sobukus AT sourcemage.org  2008-02-04 04:55 
-------
Ok, it doesn't seem likely that Timo gets the time to adapt the patch for 
openldap 2.4 soon. Also it doesn't seem likely that openldap upstream will 
incorporate the necessary security soon.
Thing is, his LDAP + PAM setup is something Timo wants to rely on and, based 
on past experience with new openldap versions, he is... careful.

I am wondering about forking off a spell for Timo's openldap (considering his 
patched openldap a different upstream distribution).
Perhaps naming it openldap-context or such.
We'd need an openldap provider, then... and pam_ldap would depend on 
openldap-context if the context patch is enabled there, on normal openldap if 
not.

So, would such a setup be acceptable or is it considered personal hacking?
What do other people, who actually use openldap for security-sensitive stuff, 
think about this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.