sm-grimoire-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: SourceMage Grimoire Bug List
List archive
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org
- To: sm-grimoire-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 9600] New: unknown bug
- Date: 1 Apr 2007 05:17:37 -0000
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9600
Summary: unknown bug
Product: Prometheus
OS/Version: All
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
Component: Unknown
AssignedTo: sm-grimoire-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
ReportedBy: adam AT isurf.ca
don't forget elinks. though if it's going to get looked for by binary name we
may want to consider asking in the elinks spells if a links symlink should be
created and conflict with links if so.
--
------- Additional Comments From eric AT sandall.us 2005-08-24 19:55 -------
For now I'll just add the ones that docbook-utils says it can use. Others can
add more 'compatible' options (e.g. elinks) as they test them.
--
------- Additional Comments From eric AT sandall.us 2005-08-24 19:57 -------
Also, with the 'option' to link elinks to 'lynx' or 'links' (more likely the
latter) we'd either have to make the link and add some conflicts or elinks
couldn't provide HTML_TO_TEXT for docbook-utils (until Bug #6811 is finished).
(Sorry, added comment to Bug #9601 instead of this bug)
--
------- Additional Comments From jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org 2005-08-24 22:19
-------
Well, FWIW, elinks *is* links as much as twibright is. links is dead for
future
development, it forked into elinks (steady ongoing development),
links2/twibright (image support and otherwise slow development), and
links-hacked (combining elinks and twibright back together again, sort of).
The thing is that any of these can provide the actual function HTML_TO_TEXT
with
or without a symlink to let them get called as links or lynx or w3m. That
docbook-utils also wants the thing that provides that function to be called
something specific seems to me to be an extra problem. Otherwise we're saying
HTML_TO_TEXT means "can convert html to text via one of exactly
/usr/bin/{lynx,links,w3m}". Is that what we want for our "generic"
providers?
Is it an option to patch this script ourselves to be able to use any of the
providers of HTML_TO_TEXT we offer, via whatever their main binary is, and try
to get upstream to include that patch?
--
------- Additional Comments From jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org 2005-09-16 06:49
-------
To complicate this further, mutt's about to start depending on either lynx or
w3m (but not links) to build its docs.
Methinks the upstreams need to get a better grip on this...
--
------- Additional Comments From eric AT sandall.us 2005-09-24 18:14 -------
I'd rather we patch docbook-utils (and send that upstream) to support elinks
(if
elinks works). For now I've just added support for links, links-twibright,
lynx,
and w3m.
Change #66652 for devel.
Change #66654 for test.
Change #66657 for stable-rc/0.2.
--
------- Additional Comments From jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org 2007-03-31 23:17
-------
reassign to sm-grimoire-bugs
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
- [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 9600] New: unknown bug, bugzilla-daemon, 04/01/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.