sm-grimoire-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: SourceMage Grimoire Bug List
List archive
[SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org
- To: sm-grimoire-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions
- Date: 28 Nov 2006 12:21:32 -0000
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10198
------- Additional Comments From sobukus AT sourcemage.org 2006-11-28 06:21
-------
Eh...do we need the forced -m64 flags?
A 64 bit compiler does it per default, but we need to tell sorcery somewhere
to compile a 64 bit gcc.
Well the HOST should take care for that.
I just verified again that the -march=pentium4 or -march=i686 indeed is a bad
idea without specifying -m32 or even _with_ specifying -m64!
See:
cc1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set
So that point is clear, I just would like to have some agreement on removing
the -m64 as being unnecessary... though, something like grub that wants to
compile with 32 bit could then try to care for that on spell level.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
[SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions,
bugzilla-daemon, 11/05/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions, bugzilla-daemon, 11/28/2006
- [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions, bugzilla-daemon, 11/28/2006
- [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions, bugzilla-daemon, 11/28/2006
- [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions, bugzilla-daemon, 11/28/2006
- [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions, bugzilla-daemon, 11/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.