sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Partitioning upstream packages into libs and binaries.
- From: Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Partitioning upstream packages into libs and binaries.
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:14:59 -0300
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:22:10 -0500
David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org> wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 09:19 PM, Thomas Orgis wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is there a way with sorcery I missed, enabling us to avoid repeating
> > the same build process for xyz-0 and xyz-util? Some common scheme to
> > select portions of the stuff for actual installation? The latter
> > should be easy with castfs, shouldn't it?
>
> There's no built in way in sorcery to only install a few files, but
> keep a binary cache of both.
>
> We don't build packages and then install them, we install things and
> then create a binary cache of it. It would be a nice to have, but it'd
> be a fundamental shift in the core of how we install things.
But we do staging... we're just a few steps away.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Partitioning upstream packages into libs and binaries.,
Ismael Luceno, 11/22/2013
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Partitioning upstream packages into libs and binaries., Ismael Luceno, 11/22/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.