Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>]

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:13:23 -0600
David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org> wrote:
<...>
> I don't mind what language we write it in. I think bash is not
> particularly well suited. Bash is excellent for tying programs
> together, so maybe we write our programs in something other than
> bash, and use bash to tie them together? Not sure how that would
> shake out. I would like to use a language designed for writing
> software, rather than a shell, since we are building software to
> build software. (yo dawg)

I think the problem isn't with bash but with the way sorcery was
developed. But I would like a change, as long as it makes things
simpler (for the machine, I mean).

It should be more UNIXly and stream-oriented. There's a lot that could
be greatly simplified.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature