sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:31:08 +0200
>> Perhaps it is a better idea to go directly to glibc 2.16.
I updated glibc to 2.16 in devel-glibc-2.15 a week ago.
How many developers have tested it?
Is it a time to pull it into test grimoire so somebody really try to
cast it?
Or we just postpone it the same way as we postponed glibc in
devel-private-tj-glibc-no-linux2.4 branch?
--
Ladislav Hagara
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch,
Ladislav Hagara, 07/09/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch,
Paul Vinogradov, 07/09/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch, Ladislav Hagara, 07/10/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch,
Treeve Jelbert, 07/10/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch, Paul Vinogradov, 07/10/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch,
Paul Vinogradov, 07/10/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch,
Sukneet Basuta, 07/14/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch, Paul Vinogradov, 07/14/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch,
Sukneet Basuta, 07/14/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] glibc 2.15 branch,
Paul Vinogradov, 07/09/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.