sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
- To: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] llvm
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:52:02 +0200
Hi,
any reason we have llvm 2.9 in test grimoire?
I wanted to cast lightspark and got "LLVM !=2.9 is required!".
Any reason we have devel-llvm-3.0 branch with llvm 3.0 and devel-xorg-modular branch with llvm 3.1?
Any protest to pull 3.1 into master?
Thanks.
Ladislav Hagara
-
[SM-Discuss] llvm,
Ladislav Hagara, 06/12/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] llvm, Paul Vinogradov, 06/12/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] llvm,
Treeve Jelbert, 06/12/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] llvm, flux, 06/12/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.