Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Sukneet Basuta <sukneet AT gmail.com>]

git compresses the blobs as well. See
http://schacon.github.com/git/user-manual.html#object-details

For what its worth, my vote is to leave it uncompressed. ~10kB isn't
much these days.

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Paul Vinogradov <vin.public AT gmail.com> wrote:
> git compresses reference information not the files temselves, doesnt it?
>
> В Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:59:45 +0200
> Treeve Jelbert <treeve AT scarlet.be> пишет:
>
>> I have a patch to a spell. The patch size is ~ 10k bytes, 200 lines
>>
>> Is it better to compress the patch or not?
>> If it is not compressed, git can do a better job of reducing space usage.
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Treeve
>> _______________________________________________
>> SM-Discuss mailing list
>> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours Paul Vinogradov
> E-mails: public AT sourcemage.org; vin.public AT gmail.com; pol-vinogradov AT mail.ru
> ICQ: 353481225
> Jabber ID: vinpol AT jabber.ru
> Registered as #384571 at Linux Counter (http://counter.li.org/)
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>