sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-emul32

From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-emul32
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:06:28 -0600

On 01/11/2012 11:41 AM, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> Shouldn't smgl-emul32 be in binary instead of z-rejected?

Probably, but I don't think it's even up to date enough to actually use.
I could be wrong on this. If you can verify it, as you're moving it,
that'd be great.

Thanks,
David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[SM-Discuss] smgl-emul32, Ismael Luceno, 01/11/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-emul32, David Kowis, 01/11/2012
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-emul32, Lalo Martins, 01/12/2012
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-emul32, Sukneet Basuta, 01/12/2012