sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:06:32 +0100
>> Perhaps we can eventually add support to configure sorcery to "prefer" a
>> certain package option (.gz, .xz, etc.) depending on what's available in
>> a spell (this would require changing spells a little bit too perhaps),
>> and if a certain option isn't available it can go with the next
>> preference down in the list. Just an idea, probably a royal pain to
>> implement, and possibly not for much gain, but now it's out there. :)
>
> Cool idea, but that will also probably be a pain for grimoire
> developers (having to update hashs, sigs, etc).
I don't think we need sorcery option to choose prefered archive type for
summon. Imho it is worthless.
In history, we created md5 hash of decompressed tarball so that hash
works with both gz and bz2.
Kernel team now also sign only decompressed tarball (tar) and not
compressed ones (tar.gz, tar bz2, tar.xz).
--
Ladislav Hagara
-
[SM-Discuss] xz archives,
Sukneet Basuta, 11/12/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
flux, 11/12/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
Sukneet Basuta, 11/12/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
flux, 11/12/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
Sukneet Basuta, 11/12/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
Ladislav Hagara, 11/13/2011
-
Message not available
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives, Ladislav Hagara, 11/20/2011
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
Ladislav Hagara, 11/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
Sukneet Basuta, 11/12/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
flux, 11/12/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
Sukneet Basuta, 11/12/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xz archives,
flux, 11/12/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.