Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] wondering about the grimoire branches...

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] wondering about the grimoire branches...
  • Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:46:55 +0200

On Tuesday 30 of March 2010 20:13:37 Mark Bainter wrote:
> flux [flux AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> > Thomas Orgis (thomas-forum AT orgis.org) wrote [10.03.30 23:56]:
> > There's an easy solution to get what you want: multiple copies of the
> > repository. Each separate working tree could be a different checked out
> > version. You can have each separate working copy track it's own upstream
> > branch, or you can set up a single local repository as a shared
> > repository, and have that one pull from upstream to get the updates.
> > Then you can check your local shared repository out as many times as you
> > want, and you also get everything nicely separated.
>
> Maybe I'm not following you here, or there's some aspect of this setup
> I'm not aware of, but I don't think this solves the problem of having an
> entire spell tree for every branch.
The cleanest thing to do is to switch to that branch temporarily and then use
scribbler to copy the spell into a new grimoire. This can't help you with
testing the gnome or kde branches (at least not without some simple
scripting), but it's good enough for gcc and similar small-change branches
(half of our devel branches are like that).

LP
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page