sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:22:41 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> Hi,
> stable gtk+2 was released, spell is in test grimoire.
> Hal issue was fixed by 68725f60db86a3a586db5313c8660399c880e4a9,
> I just set "--disable-policy-kit" even policykit was enabled/installed
> and set PATCHLEVEL ++.
>
> Seems some problems can arise with gobject-introspection.
> Some spells (for example clutter) if gobject-introspection is installed
> need some another spell (pango in this example) compiled with
> gobject-introspection. It is a problem if gobject-introspection was
> installed after pango. There are two possibilities, recast pango with
> gobject-introspection (seems spells will need optional_depends on this)
> or just remove gobject-introspection and cluter or clutter-gtk will cast
> OK. Need some investigation.
> Moreover seems gtk+2 has some issue, and even gobject-introspection is
> installed it is cast without gobject-introspection support.
> So clutter-gtk has to be cast without gobject-introspection support
> (added optional_depends for it already).
>
> Probably the best advice for users is "do not install
> gobject-introspection" now. :-)
I think you may want to move all this GNOME stuff to a separate branch
and revert it in test until it does get working. That's why we have
branches. :)
You can use SUB_DEPENDS for the gobject-inspection extra requirements in
pango for certain packages. Sorcery would then force a recompile with
the appropriate flags.
- -sandalle
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkq61/AACgkQtYuTaRcbbyZaogCfbiLH5vvUgZeYt/bEnMOkclDO
SpcAnR+jdhP2rCJIPHOh7K9pyQNhhJQv
=y0cj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0,
Ladislav Hagara, 09/22/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0,
Eric Sandall, 09/22/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0,
David Kowis, 09/23/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0,
Ladislav Hagara, 09/23/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0,
Eric Sandall, 09/24/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0, Eric Sandall, 09/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0,
Eric Sandall, 09/24/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0,
Ladislav Hagara, 09/23/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0,
David Kowis, 09/23/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0, Vasil Yonkov, 09/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNOME 2.28.0,
Eric Sandall, 09/22/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.